|
I am not happy with the Republican Party, but on
Nov. 7 I will cast my vote for my incumbent Republican congressman and
senator nonetheless. I don't feel I have any choice — and it's not just
that the Democrats running in my state are particularly unappealing
candidates.
I'm angry
at Republicans for abandoning their principles. This Republican
president, aided and abetted by Congress, has increased federal
spending at a reckless rate, even when the costs of the war in Iraq are
taken out of the equation. I'm embarrassed by the scandals that have
plagued some Republicans and by the abject failure of the leadership to
do anything meaningful on lobbying reform.
I'm sickened
by the cronyism that protected former Congressman Mark Foley and put
children at risk. I'm disappointed that after years of claiming to be
the party of colorblind equal opportunity, Republicans have actually
expanded racial preferences in federal programs. I'm disheartened by
the demagoguery on immigration and the refusal to do the one thing
guaranteed to stop illegal immigration, namely, enact a broad guest
worker program.
But none of
these issues will make me stay home, much less vote Democratic. The
fact is I don't trust the Democratic Party to lead this country in a
time of uncertainty and war. While the Democrats say they want to
refocus the nation's energy on the war on terror, they've demonstrated
time and again that they oppose the most effective means of fighting
terrorism.
Democrats
would interfere with the National Security Agency's ability to
intercept communications between terrorists abroad and their agents in
the United States. They would extend to terrorists being held overseas
access to the U.S. civilian court system, which could jeopardize
national security by making classified intelligence available to the
terrorists and their attorneys. They would treat terrorists like common
criminals rather than as combatants who are at war with us.
Nor do I
trust that Democrats would do the right thing in Iraq — not that the
current administration has had a stellar record there, either. I'm
tired of debating whether we should or should not have gone into Iraq —
both Republicans and half the Democrats in the Senate voted to
authorize the war in 2003. The question is what the United States
should do now. It's clear the war is going very badly and that Iraq is
on the verge of a civil war. Democrats have offered no clear plan
except to leave Iraq as quickly as possible, regardless of the
consequences.
And I don't
think the Democrats would back tough measures if Iran and North Korea
continue to pursue nuclear weapons either. Certainly the Clinton
administration's record with respect to North Korea doesn't inspire
confidence. Democrats like carrots a lot better than sticks and are
more concerned with "world opinion" than American interests.
Democratic
control of Congress also worries me when it comes to the economy.
Democrats always want to raise taxes in order to pay for social
programs, transferring money out of the hands of ordinary people and
turning it over to bureaucrats. Most Democrats are also infatuated with
government regulation and rarely find a government directive they don't
like. Higher taxes and more regulations are a recipe to cool our
healthy economy. Democrats seem to want to punish businesses rather
than encourage the creation of more wealth. And they have a nasty
propensity to encourage envy and class warfare, which benefits no one.
Politics is
sometimes about making the least bad choice. I know some of my fellow
Republicans will stay home on Election Day, hoping to send the party a
message that they're fed up with the current leadership. But putting
the Democrats in control won't bring about needed changes — it will
make matters even worse. The place for revolt is within the party
itself, by urging the elected representatives to pick carefully when
they choose House and Senate leadership in January and by challenging
incumbents in primaries next time if they don't stand up for basic
Republican principles.
|