Tuesday
Feb 09th

Center for Equal Opportunity

Lost Password?
Home arrow Our Focus Areas arrow Affirmative Action arrow Education arrow Preferences in College Admission
Preferences in College Admission
Racial and Ethnic Preferences at University of Nebraska Law School PDF Print E-mail
Preferences in College Admission
Tuesday, 07 October 2008
(Lincoln, Nebraska) A new study released today by the Center for Equal Opportunity documents evidence of severe discrimination based on race and ethnicity in law school admissions at the University of Nebraska. African Americans and, to a lesser extent, Latinos are admitted with significantly lower undergraduate grade-point averages and LSAT scores than whites and, again to a lesser extent, Asians.
download-big.png

University of Nebraska College of Law
Download Study

 
Racial and Ethnic Preferences in Admission at the University of Arizona College of Law PDF Print E-mail
Preferences in College Admission
Wednesday, 01 October 2008
 The University of Arizona (UA) College of Law awarded an extremely large degree of preference to blacks over whites and Asians, and to a lesser extent, to Hispanics and Asians over whites.
download-big.png

University of Arizona College of Law
Download Study

 
Racial and Ethnic Admission Preferences at Arizona State University College of Law PDF Print E-mail
Preferences in College Admission
Wednesday, 01 October 2008
The Arizona State University (ASU) College of Law awarded an extraordinarily large degree of preference to blacks and Hispanics over whites and Asians with the same credentials and background in its 2006 and 2007 entering classes.
download-big.png

Arizona State University College of Law
Download Study

 
Linda Chavez Addresses the Independence Institute in Golden, Colorado PDF Print E-mail
Preferences in College Admission
Wednesday, 17 September 2008

Read more...
 
Racial and Ethnic Preferences in Undergraduate Admissions at Six North Carolina Public Universities PDF Print E-mail
Preferences in College Admission
Monday, 28 May 2007

By Robert Lerner, Ph.D. and
Althea K. Nagai, Ph.D.


Executive Summary

Read more...
 
Responses from the University of Michigan PDF Print E-mail
Preferences in College Admission
Tuesday, 31 October 2006

View Response

 
New Studies Document Racial Preferences in Undergrad, Law, and Med School Admissions at the University of Michigan PDF Print E-mail
Preferences in College Admission
Monday, 16 October 2006

Download PDF

 
Racial and Ethnic Preferences in Undergraduate Admissions at the University of Michigan PDF Print E-mail
Preferences in College Admission
Monday, 16 October 2006

Download PDF

 
Racial and Ethnic Admission Preferences at the University of Michigan Law School PDF Print E-mail
Preferences in College Admission
Monday, 16 October 2006

Download PDF

 
Racial and Ethnic Admission Preferences at the University of Michigan Medical School PDF Print E-mail
Preferences in College Admission
Monday, 16 October 2006

Download PDF

 
Center for Equal Opportunity Responds to the University of Michigan PDF Print E-mail
Preferences in College Admission
Monday, 16 October 2006

Download PDF

 
NEW Study Finds Admissions Discrimination at UVa, W&M Law School, and NC State PDF Print E-mail
Preferences in College Admission
Thursday, 11 November 2004

The Virginia Association of Scholars and the Center for Equal Opportunity released a new study of the role of race and ethnicity in admissions at the three schools. The study — written by VAS Chairman David J. Armor and based on data obtained from the schools through freedom-of-information requests — found that race played a decisive role in the admissions process at all three schools. Preferences favoring African Americans were especially prominent at the University of Virginia and William & Mary law school, and significant though weaker at North Carolina State.

 
Michigan's Faulty Diversity Report Exposed PDF Print E-mail
Preferences in College Admission
Tuesday, 27 May 2003
 
Preferences at the Service Academies PDF Print E-mail
Preferences in College Admission
Tuesday, 01 April 2003
During oral arguments in Gratz v. Bollinger Supreme Court Justices raised questions about the use of racial preferences in the armed services. In 1999 CEO examined this issue and concluded preferences are used at two service academies. While the CEO study found that preferences were used at West Point and Annapolis, it also concluded that the degree of preference was much less than that used by the University of Michigan (indeed, it found no statistically significant evidence that Latinos were given preferences at West Point).

 
Where does President Bush stand on racial preferences? PDF Print E-mail
Preferences in College Admission
Thursday, 23 January 2003
In 1998 the Campaign for a Colorblind America commissioned a Candidate Questionnaire on race and sent it to every statewide candidate in Texas.  The following are the responses of then Texas Governor George Bush.

This questionnaire seeks to determine your position on issues of government action in the area of race and opportunity in the United States today.
Read more...
 
Racial Discrimination Found at Virginia Law Schools [More Info] PDF Print E-mail
Preferences in College Admission
Tuesday, 23 April 2002

Two of Virginia’s Three Public Law Schools Use Severe Admissions Discrimination

This detailed, 50-page study concludes that racial discrimination is widespread in Virginia law school admissions. The report focuses on the three Virginia public law schools -- the University of Virginia, William & Mary, and George Mason University -- and reveals odds favoring black applicants as high as 731 to 1.

 
Racial and Ethnic Preferences in Florida PDF Print E-mail
Preferences in College Admission
Monday, 11 March 2002

A letter from CEO's Roger Clegg and Edward Blum to public school superintendents in Florida

Read more...
 
Racial and Ethnic Preferences in Admissions at Five Public Medical Schools PDF Print E-mail
Preferences in College Admission
Monday, 11 June 2001
 
Critique of Gurin Report PDF Print E-mail
Preferences in College Admission
Monday, 07 May 2001

On May 7, 2001 the Center for Equal Opportunity released "A Critique of the Expert Report of Patricia Gurin in Gratz v. Bollinger." The critique, authored by Drs. Robert Lerner and Althea Nagai, discusses an expert witness report commissioned by the University of Michigan to defend its use of racial and ethnic preferences in admissions, which has been challenged as unconstitutional discrimination in a lawsuit. The CEO study concludes that Gurin's report is fundamentally flawed in a variety of ways and fails to offer persuasive evidence in favor of using racial and ethnic admissions preferences.

 

[DOWNLOAD PDF]

 
Affirmative Action in Michigan Higher Education PDF Print E-mail
Preferences in College Admission
Sunday, 06 May 2001

Affirmative Action in Undergraduate Admissions at the Public Colleges and Universities of Michigan


By Robert Lerner, Ph.D. and
Althea K. Nagai, Ph.D.

Executive Summary

Read more...
 
Race and University of Michigan Admissions: What are the chances that you'll get in? PDF Print E-mail
Preferences in College Admission
Saturday, 05 May 2001
By answering the questions below, you can learn what your chances were of being admitted to the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor in 1995. Your chances would depend on your skin color and your ethnic group, in addition to your SAT scores and your grade point average.
Read more...
 
Racial and Ethnic Preferences and Consequences at the University of Maryland School of Medicine PDF Print E-mail
Preferences in College Admission
Friday, 30 March 2001
By Robert Lerner, Ph.D. and Althea K. Nagai, Ph.D.

This report on the University of Maryland School of Medicine (UMSM) is the first in a series that will analyze the extent of racial and ethnic preferences in law and medical school admissions.Additionally, this and subsequent CEO reports will investigate the consequences of racial and ethnic preferences on subsequent performance once students are enrolled. This study of UMSM examines both the use of racial and ethnic preferences in admissions and the medical school performance of those that subsequently enrolled. The report examines the efforts extended by UMSM to keep these students in medical school. It also presents statistical evidence of how well or poorly they performed in class and on the critical medical licensing exams.
 
Pervasive Preferences: Interactive "Predictors" Race and the Chances that You'll get into College PDF Print E-mail
Preferences in College Admission
Thursday, 29 March 2001
After obtaining the admissions data for forty-seven public colleges and universities throughout the nation-the schools analyzed on this website by Drs. Robert Lerner and Althea Nagai in their monograph on "Pervasive Preferences: Racial and Ethnic Discrimination in Undergraduate Admissions across the Nation"-the Center for Equal Opportunity decided that an interactive feature would be interesting for our readers.

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR

NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY

UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA

 
Prevasive Preferences Racial and Ethnic Discrimination in Undergraduate Admissions Across the Nation PDF Print E-mail
Preferences in College Admission
Wednesday, 28 March 2001

This report discusses the admissions data for forty-seven public colleges and universities throughout the nation. The average difference in academic credentials among those admitted, whether measured by test scores or by grades and high-school class rank, between blacks and whites, and to a lesser extent between Hispanics and whites, is very large. There are few such differences between whites and Asians.

Read more...
 
Preferences in Maryland Higher Education PDF Print E-mail
Preferences in College Admission
Tuesday, 06 March 2001

Racial and Ethnic Preferences in Undergraduate Admissions at Maryland Four-Year Public Colleges and Universities

By Robert Lerner, Ph.D. and Althea K. Nagai, Ph.D.

Read more...
 
Preferences at the University of Virginia: Racial and Ethnic Preferences in Undergraduate Admission PDF Print E-mail
Preferences in College Admission
Friday, 22 October 1999

This study represents further analysis of admission practices at the University of Virginia, originally reported in Preferences in Virginia Higher Education. That study, issued in January 1999, presented evidence of racial and ethnic preferences in Virginia colleges and universities, including the University of Virginia (UVA). The report used data from the 1996 admissions process. At the time, UVA officials asserted that our data did not always match theirs. This was of some interest to us, since we had obtained our data directly from UVA on computer disks (and, indeed, had to paid for it). A further examination revealed that there were a number of cases that UVA somehow inadvertently dropped from the files we were given.

Click for full Study

Read more...
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>

Results 1 - 26 of 33

Newsletter Sign-up

Support CEO

Purchase

Advertisement