Thursday
Sep 02nd

Center for Equal Opportunity

Lost Password?
Home arrow Other Issues
Other Issues
Amicus Brief in Ricci v. DeStefano PDF Print E-mail
Wednesday, 25 February 2009
On February 26, 2009, the Center for Equal Opportunity filed this amicus brief with the Supreme Court in Ricci v. DeStefano, where the City of New Haven threw out the results of a firefighters exam because it didn't like its racial results: not enough "diversity." The Court had granted review in this case after CEO urged them to in another brief.

Download Brief download-big.png

 
Ricci v. DeStefano PDF Print E-mail
Thursday, 16 October 2008
The Center for Equal Opportunity has joined in this amicus brief, urging the Supreme Court to grant review in Ricci v. DeStefano, where the City of New Haven threw out the results of a firefighters exam because it didn't like its racial results: not enough "diversity."

download-big.pngDOWNLOAD


 
CEO President & General Counsel Roger Clegg testifies before a subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee regarding H.R. 40, the "Commission to Study Reparation Proposals for African-Americans Act" PDF Print E-mail
Tuesday, 18 December 2007
Image
Read more...
 
Center for Equal Opportunity Praises Court's School Decisions PDF Print E-mail
Thursday, 02 August 2007

Calls them "Victory for Parents and Students of All Races"

The Center for Equal Opportunity praised the Supreme Court's decisions in the Seattle and Louisville school cases today.

CEO chairman Linda Chavez said: "Today's decisions vindicate the principle in Brown v. Board of Education that schoolchildren should not be assigned to schools on the basis of skin color. It is a victory for parents and students of all races."

CEO president and general counsel Roger Clegg said: "As America becomes increasingly a multiracial and multiethnic society, it also becomes more and more untenable to have laws that categorize our people because of race and national origin."

Both Chavez and Clegg said that they hoped that the Bush administration, which had filed briefs in the cases urging the Court to strike down the race-based student assignments, would use the decisions to dismantle racial and ethnic preferences still being used by the federal government, and to attack racial and ethnic discrimination elsewhere.

CEO had joined an amicus brief with the Pacific Legal Foundation in urging the Court to grant review in the cases, and then joined again with PLF after the Court had granted review, urging the Court to declare the race-based student assignment policies in the two school districts to be unconstitutional.
The Center for Equal Opportunity is a nonprofit, nonpartisan research and educational foundation that
focuses on civil rights, bilingual education, and immigration and assimilation issues nationwide.

 
Disparate Impact PDF Print E-mail
Monday, 16 July 2007
The “disparate impact” approach to civil rights has created many problems and aggravated others.  Under this approach, a practice is said to be illegal if it results in racially disproportionate effects—that is, has a disparate impact—even if it is neutral on its face, is applied neutrally, and was adopted for race-neutral reasons.  For instance, in a seminal Supreme Court decision, an employer who required a high-school diploma was found to have violated the civil rights laws because this disproportionately disqualified African Americans—even though there had been no finding that he adopted this rule as a way of keeping out blacks.  (Note:  The disparate impact approach can also be applied to ethnicity, sex, disability, age, and so forth.)

Read more...