Wednesday
May 14th

Center for Equal Opportunity

Home arrow Our Focus Areas arrow Other Issues arrow Desegregation
Desegregation
School Desegregation PDF Print E-mail
Literally hundreds of school districts in the United States remain under school-desegregation court orders, even after the fiftieth anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Brown v. Board of Education (1954). This doesn’t make any sense. If there are still segregated schools in these districts, it is long past overdue that those schools be desegregated.

Read more...
 
Public Interest Law Firms PDF Print E-mail

Institute for Justice

Southeastern Equity Center

Mountain States Legal Foundation

Pacific Legal Foundation

Center for Individual Rights

The Institute for Justice

Southeastern Legal Foundation

Atlantic Legal Foundation

 
Briefs PDF Print E-mail

Plaintiffs’ Brief, Burris v. Rockhill School District No. 3 (N.C. D.Ct. 2002)

Appellees’ Brief, Belk v. The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (4th Cir. 1999)

 
Cases PDF Print E-mail

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (Brown I), 347 U.S. 483 (1954).

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (Brown II), 349 U.S. 294 (1955)

Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Dowell, 498 U.S. 237 (1991)

Dayton Board of Education v. Brinkman, 433 U.S. 406 (1977)

Missouri v. Jenkins, 515 U.S. 70 (1995)

Freeman v. Pitts, 503 U.S. 467 (1992)

Moore v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 400 U.S. 803 (1970)

Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1 (1971)

Brown v. Unified School District, 56 F.Supp. 1212 (D-Kansas July 27, 1999)

Capacchione v. Charlotte-Mecklenberg Schools 57 F. Supp. 2d 228 (WDNC 1999)

U.S v. Texas, 5th Cir. October 29, 1998 (Cite prior to being published: No. 9740162CV0 - 10/29/98)

People Who Care v. Rockford Board of Education, 7th Cir. April 18, 2001 (No. 003200 - 04/18/2001)

US v. Georgia,171 F.3d 1239 (11th Cir. 1999)

Lockett v. Board of Education of Muscogee County School District, 111 F.2d 839 (11th Cir. 1999)

Lee v. Etowah County, 963 F.2d 1416 (11th Cir. 1992)

 
Statutes PDF Print E-mail

Title IV of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,

42 U.S.C. 2000c through 2000c-9

20 U.S.C. 1701-1720

 
Center for Equal Opportunity Praises Court's School Decisions PDF Print E-mail

Calls them "Victory for Parents and Students of All Races"

The Center for Equal Opportunity praised the Supreme Court's decisions in the Seattle and Louisville school cases today.

CEO chairman Linda Chavez said: "Today's decisions vindicate the principle in Brown v. Board of Education that schoolchildren should not be assigned to schools on the basis of skin color. It is a victory for parents and students of all races."

CEO president and general counsel Roger Clegg said: "As America becomes increasingly a multiracial and multiethnic society, it also becomes more and more untenable to have laws that categorize our people because of race and national origin."

Both Chavez and Clegg said that they hoped that the Bush administration, which had filed briefs in the cases urging the Court to strike down the race-based student assignments, would use the decisions to dismantle racial and ethnic preferences still being used by the federal government, and to attack racial and ethnic discrimination elsewhere.

CEO had joined an amicus brief with the Pacific Legal Foundation in urging the Court to grant review in the cases, and then joined again with PLF after the Court had granted review, urging the Court to declare the race-based student assignment policies in the two school districts to be unconstitutional.
The Center for Equal Opportunity is a nonprofit, nonpartisan research and educational foundation that
focuses on civil rights, bilingual education, and immigration and assimilation issues nationwide.

 
CEO president Roger Clegg discusses the Seattle and Louisville race-based assignment cases before the Supreme Court (Video) PDF Print E-mail

Read more...
 
Chavez Letter PDF Print E-mail

A letter sent from CEO President Linda Chavez to every judge in those districts having schools on the Justice Department list, urging them to determine whether continued judicial supervision in each school system is appropriate.

Read more...
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Support CEO

Secondary Materials

Money and School Performance: Lessons from the Kansas City Desegregation Experiment by Paul Ciotti, Cato Policy Analysis No. 298, March 16, 1998

The Destructiveness of Continuing Desegregation Orders:What Happens When the School You Go to Depends on the Color of Your Skin, Roger Clegg, Findlaw Commentary (September 5, 2002).

The Role of Res Judicata in Recognizing Unitary Status, Hugh Joseph Beard, Jr. Louisiana Law Review Vol. 49 No. 6 1989

School Desegregation Cases: The “Good Faith” Requirement, Charles L. Patin, Jr.and William M. Gordon, 159 Ed.Law Rep. [407] (Jan 31, 2002)

David J. Armor, Forced Justice: School Desegregation and the Law (Oxford University Press, 1996).