Education
CEO Praises Supreme Court’s Decision to Hear Fisher v. University of Texas
- Details
- Published Date
- Written by Roger Clegg
(Falls Church, VA) The Center for Equal Opportunity praised the Supreme Court’s decision today to grant review in Fisher v. University of Texas, a case challenging the use of racial and ethnic preferences by the university in undergraduate admissions.
Back to Madison!
- Details
- Published Date
- Written by Roger Clegg
The Center for Equal Opportunity went back to Madison, Wisconsin, this week! Our studies revealing the heavy weight given to race and ethnicity in undergrad and law school admissions at the University of Wisconsin prompted a hearing at the state legislature. The chairman of the relevant committee is no friend of this kind of discrimination, and we were asked to testify. The hearings went very well, and you can read my testimony on ceo’s website at www.ceousa.org .
As you know, our earlier visit to Wisconsin last month was a great success. With the protestors, politically correct university officials, and all the media excitement, CEO’s studies got lots of publicity, and the issue of racial and ethnic admissions preferences is now clearly on the front burner in the Badger State.
Madison Mob Madness
- Details
- Published Date
- Written by Roger Clegg
This has been an exciting week for the Center for Equal Opportunity—and for the cause of true, colorblind equal opportunity.
On Tuesday at a press conference in Madison, Wisconsin, we released two studies that revealed severe discrimination based on race and ethnicity in undergraduate and law school admissions at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, with African Americans and Latinos being given huge preferences over whites and Asians.
Standardized Testing Under Attack ... Again
- Details
- Published Date
- Written by Linda Chavez
As predictably as fall marks the beginning of the new school year in campuses across the country, so, too, does it usher in new attacks on standardized testing. The 2011 version comes in the form of a new book, "SAT Wars," a collection of essays that purports to be an authoritative account of the controversy over one particular test used by most selective universities in their admissions process. But far from being an unbiased account of the pros and cons of using any standardized test -- much less the SAT, one of the most thoroughly studied, modified, and continuously validated tests in history -- the book is really an attack on standardized testing per se.
Back to the Supreme Court
- Details
- Published Date
- Written by Roger Clegg
The Supreme Court may have an opportunity to do some good soon in the fight against preferential treatment based on race and ethnicity. That’s because last Friday the petition for rehearing en banc (that is, asking the full court of appeals to rehear the case after a panel decision) was denied in Fisher v. University of Texas.
Here's Linda Chavez on The O'Reilly Factor
- Details
- Published Date
- Written by Roger Clegg
In case you missed it, here’s Center for Equal Opportunity chairman Linda Chavez on The O’Reilly Factor last Friday, talking about the studies that the CEO released last week in Madison, Wisconsin, that revealed severe racial preferences in state university undergrad and law school admissions there—and talking about the thuggish reception we received in Madison.
New and Un-Improved Justification for Affirmative Action
- Details
- Published Date
- Written by Roger Clegg
The Chronicle of Higher Education recently had a piece by Professor Elizabeth Anderson titled “Affirmative Action Is about Helping All of Us,” in which she laments “the same tired arguments on the left” that are being used to defend affirmative action in higher education, and then proposes her own new and (supposedly) improved theory to be used in defending such discrimination from those attacks by “the right that reflect ignorance of the realities of race in America.”
Racial Preferences in Wisconsin
- Details
- Published Date
- Written by Linda Chavez
The campus at the University of Wisconsin-Madison erupted this week after the release of two studies documenting the heavy use of race in deciding which students to admit to the undergraduate and law schools. The evidence of discrimination is undeniable, and the reaction by critics was undeniably dishonest and thuggish.
Racial and Ethnic Admission Preferences at the University of Michigan Law School
- Details
- Published Date
- Written by CEO Staff
Racial and Ethnic Preferences in Undergraduate Admissions at the University of Michigan

